top of page

Criteria for HOA Validity

State law and founding documents set clear criteria for HOA validity.  Here's how to objectively evaluate any claim to HOA power:

​Validity Criteria


HOA validity can be judged on four criteria, and it's an all-or-nothing deal:  All four criteria must be met.   Click here for more detail.​

​

  1. HOA PROVISION.  The subdivision’s declaration must contain an HOA provision. 

  2. LEGAL ENTITY.  The HOA organization must be some type of legal entity, most often a nonprofit corporation.

  3. PROPER FORMATION.  The entity must be formed under appropriate authority and procedure.

  4. LAWFUL OPERATION.  An entity must endeavor to comply with all aspects of the law, founding docs, and org policy.​

​​​

HOA Litmus Test

 

Work through the flowchart below.  If you at any point land on NO, stop -- the entity in question is not a valid HOA. â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹â€‹

HOA Criteria Flowchart.gif

​

​

HOA Validity in Thaynes Canyon

 

​The Declaration of Thaynes Canyon Subdivision, which was recorded by the developer in 1971, contains an HOA provision in Section III.  The developer at the same time also incorporated a nonprofit entity named Thaynes Canyon HOA.  That properly formed entity was lawfully operated until its dissolution in 1986.  


Twenty years later, in 2006, a group of lawsuit plaintiffs without election or vote incorporated a new entity, calling it “Thaynes Canyon 1 HOA” (TC-1).  Although the group used “HOA” in its corporation name and alleged HOA power, its claims were inherently invalid:  The entity was neither properly formed nor lawfully operated in compliance with state code and governing documents.  TC-1 was dissolved by the state in 2021.  

​

To be a valid, and HOA must meet all four criteria above.  Here's how the entities that have claimed power in Thaynes stack up:

Picture1.jpg

​​​

What now?

 

  • Do we want to remain exploitable by groups calling themselves “HOA”s – whether or not governed by election and vote, whether or not protected by incorporation, whether or not properly formed, and whether or not lawfully operated?  

  • Do we want to spend the time, energy, and resources required to safeguard the power and liability inherent in the Declaration’s HOA provision?  

  • Or shall we amend the Declaration to remove its HOA provision and decisively declare that Thaynes Canyon has no HOA?

​

​

bottom of page